Sexual Violence in History: A Bibliography

compiled by Stefan Blaschke

Contact

+ Contact Form


Search

+ Search Form


Introduction

+ Aims & Scope

+ Structure

+ History


Announcements

+ Updates

+ Calls for Papers

+ New Lectures

+ New Publications


Alphabetical Index

+ Author Index

+ Speaker Index


Chronological Index

+ Ancient History

+ Medieval History

+ Modern History


Geographical Index

+ African History

+ American History

+ Asian History

+ European History

+ Oceanian History


Topical Index

+ Prosecution

+ Cases

+ Types

+ Offenders

+ Victims

+ Society

+ Research

+ Representations


Resources

+ Institutions

+ Literature Search

+ Research

Start: Alphabetical Index: Author Index: A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | Unknown

First published: June 1, 2024 - Last updated: June 1, 2024

TITLE INFORMATION

Authors: Elizabeth Dubois and Anna Reepschlager

Title: How harassment and hate speech policies have changed over time

Subtitle: Comparing Facebook, Twitter and Reddit (2005–2020)

Journal: Policy Internet

Volume: (Published online before print)

Issue:

Year: 2024 (Received: May 5, 2023, Accepted: March 10, 2024)

Pages: 20 pages (PDF)

ISSN: 1944-2866 - Find a Library: WorldCat

Language: English

Keywords: Modern History: 21st Century | Types: Sexual Harassment



FULL TEXT

Link: Wiley Online Library (Free Access)



ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Authors: Elizabeth Dubois, Department of Communication, University of Ottawa - Author's Personal Website, Google Scholar, ORCID

Abstract: »Social media platforms make choices about what content is and is not permissible on their platforms. For example, choices about if and how to deal with online harassment and hate speech are growing problems in many online settings. But these choices are often opaque, can vary from platform to platform, and can change over time with little notice. This study examines the ways Facebook, Twitter, and Reddit have defined harassment and hate speech, as well as who they frame as responsible for dealing with harassment and hate speech over time. Using content analysis, the policy structures that house relevant policies, the policy documents themselves, and blog posts are examined. The results illustrate a phased approach to defining harassment and hate, which has become increasingly complex and nuanced over time. Additionally, this work shows a compounding view of who is responsible, which began with users but over time has come to include the platform itself, technology, and external actors such as civil society groups. This paper highlights continued opacity and increasing complexity while also providing contextual historical information necessary for both future research and platform governance decisions.« (Source: Policy Internet)

Contents:
  Abstract (p. 1)
  Introduction (p. 2)
  Background and Literature Review (p. 3)
    Platform governance, online harassment and hate speech (p. 3)
    The stories platforms tell us about how they moderate (p. 4)
    Defining terms and responsibilities (p. 5)
  Methods (p. 6)
    Data collection (p. 6)
    Analysis (p. 7)
  Analysis and Discussion (p. 8)
    Defining harassment and hate speech (p. 8)
    Complex and evolving policy structures (p. 8)
    The evolution of definitions through a phased approach (p. 8)
    Phase 1: Simple lists lacking detail (p. 9)
    PHase 2: Values over rules (p. 10)
    Phase 3: Dedicated sections and expansive detail (p. 10)
    Framing responsibility for dealing with harassment and hate speech (p. 11)
      Users (p. 12)
      The platform (p. 12)
      Technology (Automation, machine learning, and AI) (p. 13)
      External actors (p. 13)
    Compounding, re‐framing, and evolving (p. 14)
    Methodological challenges when tracking over time (p. 15)
  Conclusion (p. 16)
  Acknowledgments (p. 17)
  Data Availability Statement (p. 17)
  Endnotes (p. 17)
  References (p. 17)

Wikipedia: Social media: Facebook, Reddit, Twitter | Sex and the law: Sexual harassment